Supreme Court of the United States, 1937

Witzelberg v. Cincinnati

Witzelberg v. Cincinnati
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 11, 1937
302 U.S. 635; 58 S. Ct. 22 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Walter M. Schoenle for appellant. Mr. John D. Ellis for appellees.

Witzelberg v. Cincinnati

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dis*636miss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question. Clarke v. McDade, 165 U. S. 168, 172; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 343; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 262; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283.

Mr. Walter M. Schoenle for appellant. Mr. John D. Ellis for appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.