Supreme Court of the United States, 1937

Morris v. Alabama

Morris v. Alabama
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 18, 1937
302 U.S. 642; 58 S. Ct. 58 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Samuel J. Morris, pro se. No appearance for appellee.

Morris v. Alabama

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Alabama.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question, Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22, 30, 31; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325, 333, 334; Fort Smith Light Co. v. Paving District, 274 U. S. 387, 391; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U. S. 74, 81; (2) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 650; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.