Supreme Court of the United States, 1937

Kenney v. Murphy

Kenney v. Murphy
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 22, 1937
302 U.S. 652; 58 S. Ct. 268 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Charles I. Dawson, with whom Messrs. S. H. Brown and Orie S. Ware were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. D. M. Outcalt, with whom Messrs. Simon L. Leis and Carson Hoy were on the brief, for petitioner.

Kenney v. Murphy

Opinion of the Court

Certiorari, 301 U. S. 677 (No. 909), to the Circuit Court of Kenton County, Kentucky.

Per Curiam:

After hearing argument the Court is of the opinion that the motion of the respondent to dismiss the- writ of certiorari should be granted, and the writ is accordingly dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. McKnight v. James, 155 U. S. 685; Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, 699, 700; Weldington v. Sloan, 54 Ky. 147; Broadwell v. Commonwealth, 98 Ky. 15; Proffer v. Stewart, 259 Ky. 445.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.