Supreme Court of the United States, 1938

Rust v. Pratt

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 28, 1938

303 U.S. 621; 58 S. Ct. 648 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Mortimer Riemer for appellants. No appearance for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

City of Klamath Falls v. Bailey (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
Taylor v. Gladden (Or. 1962)
State v. Nicholson (Or. Ct. App. 2016)
Barton v. Maxwell (Or. 1997)
State v. Baker (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
State ex rel. Department of Revenue v. Parker (Or. Ct. App. 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319.

Reported below: 157 Ore. 505; 72 P. 2d 533.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.