Quanah, Acme & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United States
Quanah, Acme & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United States
308 U.S. 527; 84 L. Ed. 445; 60 S. Ct. 381; 1940 U.S. LEXIS 1025
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Local Lodge No. 721 v. Central of Georgia Railway Company (5th Cir. 1956)
- Helvering v. New President Corporation (8th Cir. 1941)
- Commissioner v. Bondholders Committee (9th Cir. 1941)
- Boggess v. Berry Corporation (9th Cir. 1956)
- Boggess ex rel. City of Fairbanks v. Berry Corp. (9th Cir. 1956)
- Acheson, Secretary of State v. Droesse (D.C. Cir. 1952)
- Acheson v. Droesse (D.C. Cir. 1952)
- Lloyd-Smith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2d Cir. 1941)
- Commissioner v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co. (5th Cir. 1941)
- Commissioner v. Palm Springs Holding Corp. (9th Cir. 1941)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Cement Investors, Inc. (10th Cir. 1941)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The decree is affirmed. Central R. Co. v. United States, 257 U. S. 247, 257; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, 311-312; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402, 411.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.