Supreme Court of the United States, 1940

Connor v. California

Connor v. California
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 25, 1940 · No. 562
309 U.S. 631; 60 S. Ct. 708 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Frank S. Connor, pro se and Mr. H. Thomas Austern for petitioner., Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

Connor v. California

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion for a writ ,of certiorari to correct a diminution of the record is denied. The motion to' remand is granted, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration of the application for habeas corpus.'

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.