Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean

Supreme Court of the United States May 27, 1940

Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean, 310 U.S. 613 (1940)

60 S. Ct. 1089

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) *614Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443. (2) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32; Leffingwell v. Warren, 2 Black 599, 603; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358, 362.

Mr. Charles Rosen for appellant. Messrs. F. A. Blanche and E. Leland Richardson for ap-pellee.

Reference

Full Case Name: Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean, Collector of Revenue
Status: Published