Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1941

Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.

Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 10, 1941 · Douglas
314 U.S. 94; 62 S. Ct. 42; 86 L. Ed. 65; 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1288; 51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 277 (United States Reports)

Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.

Opinion

Me. Justice Douglas

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a companion case to Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., ante, p. 84. The court below held that claims 2, 3, and 11 of the Mead patent (No. 1,736,544) were invalid and not infringed. 112 F. 2d 335. We granted the petition for certiorari limited to the question of validity of those claims. For the reasons stated in Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑