Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.
Cases that cite this one
41 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Tensitron, Inc. v. Bromley (District Court, E.D. New York 1966)
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Texon, Inc. (1st Cir. 1959)
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Lehman (District Court, S.D. New York 1954)
- Engineering Development Laboratories, Inc. v. Radio Corp. of America (District Court, S.D. New York 1945)
- Lever Bros. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. (District Court, D. Maryland 1943)
- Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG Corporation (2d Cir. 1942)
- LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1969)
- M. O. S. Corporation, a Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc., a Corporation (9th Cir. 1964)
- Bryan W. Nickerson, Jr. v. The Bearfoot Sole Company, Inc., the Bearfoot Airway Corporation,defendants-Appellants (6th Cir. 1963)
- Aetna Steel Products Corporation v. Southwest Products Company, a Corporation (9th Cir. 1960)
- Wyott Manufacturing Co. v. Doran Coffee Roasting Co. (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 1958)
- Long v. Arkansas Foundry Company (8th Cir. 1957)
- Bendix Aviation Corporation v. Smiths America Corporation, S. Smith & Sons (England) Ltd., Henry Hughes& Sons, Ltd., Kelvin and Hughes, Ltd. (D.C. Cir. 1957)
- Long v. Arkansas Foundry Co. (8th Cir. 1957)
- Harold M. Lewis v. Avco Manufacturing Corporation and the Harry Alter Co., Inc. (7th Cir. 1956)
- Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co. (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 1956)
- Otto v. Koppers Co. (District Court, N.D. West Virginia 1956)
- Gustav H. Bobertz, Jr. v. General Motors Corporation (6th Cir. 1955)
- United States Air Conditioning Corporation, a Corporation v. Governair Corporation, a Corporation (10th Cir. 1954)
- Hall v. Wright (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1954)
- De Burgh v. KINDEL FURNITURE COMPANY (District Court, W.D. Michigan 1954)
- Darsyn Laboratories, Inc. v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1954)
- Alex Lee Wallau, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1954)
- Hall v. Wright (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1954)
- Bobertz v. General Motors Corp. (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1954)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the opinion in these eases be amended as follows:
1. Strike from the second complete paragraph, page 2, lines 5 and 6, the phrases “one of several claims” and “which the Court sustained”.
2. In line 18 of the same paragraph substitute the word “one” for the word “another”.
3. In the fourth line from the bottom of page 3 insert the words “without prejudice” before the word “of”.
4. Modify the third, fourth, and fifth lines from the bottom of the first complete paragraph on page 9 to read: “found the elements of the invention which it described but in which, absent the flexible web element, it found no invention. In view of such want of invention and of the prior art the only material difference between the amended and the allowed claims is the presence in the former of the flexible web element and, in consequence of the surrender of the former particularizing”.
The petition for rehearing and the motion to remand are denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.