Supreme Court of the United States, 1941

Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 31, 1941

312 U.S. 668 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2007)
Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co. (Tex. 2006)
Southern Volkswagen, Inc. v. Centrix Financial, LLC (District Court, D. Maryland 2005)
In re Tableware Antitrust Litigation (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2005)
Vacation Break USA, Inc. v. Marketing Response Group & Laser Co., Inc. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2001)
Danielson Food Products, Inc. v. Poly-Clip System (District Court, N.D. Illinois 2000)
Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2000)
Belcher Oil Co. v. Florida Fuels, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1990)
Drs. Steuer & Latham, P.A. v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc. (District Court, D. South Carolina 1987)
Fine v. Barry And Enright Productions (9th Cir. 1984)
Fine v. Barry & Enright Productions (9th Cir. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered that the last two sentences of the last full paragraph on page 2 of the opinion handed down March 3 be amended to read as follows: “And the power of the combination is made even greater by reason of the affiliation of some members of the National Federation of Textiles, Inc. — that being an organization composed of about one hundred textile manufacturers, converters, dyers, and printers of silk and rayon used in making women’s garments. Those members of the Federation who are affiliated with the Guild have agreed to sell their products only to those garment manufacturers who have in turn agreed to sell only to cooperating retailers.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.