United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
313 U.S. 543
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Commodore Park, Inc. (4th Cir. 1944)
- Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service Authority (S.C. 1950)
- Burkhardt v. United States (Court of Claims 1949)
- Seiler v. City of Norwalk (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
- Mildenberger v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2010)
- Lawrence Township Board of Trustees v. City of Canal Fulton (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- Yamagiwa v. City of Half Moon Bay (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2007)
- United States v. Lewis (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 1973)
- United States v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1971)
- United States v. Louis M. Ray (5th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Ray (5th Cir. 1970)
- Grant M. Acton v. United States v. W. Clifton v. United States (9th Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Twin City Power Co. (4th Cir. 1954)
- Cross v. Pace (District Court, District of Columbia 1952)
- Rank v. Krug (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1950)
- Hurley v. American Enka Corp. (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1950)
- United States v. Martin (D.C. Cir. 1949)
- In re Veterans' Air Express Co. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1948)
- Atkinson v. United States (D. Minn. 1946)
- United States v. Willis (4th Cir. 1944)
- United States v. West Virginia Power Co. (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1944)
- Willis v. United States (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1943)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is ordered that the opinion filed March 31, 1941, be amended by inserting in the first paragraph on page 6, after the word “question,” the following: “not only are above ordinary high water mark but also claim that they”.
Opinion reported as amended, 312 U. S. 592.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.