Supreme Court of the United States, 1941

Holmes v. United States

Holmes v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 8, 1941 · Consideration, Took
314 U.S. 583; 62 S. Ct. 357 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Leo S. Holmes, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and W. Marvin Smith for the United States.

Holmes v. United States

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. On the Government’s consent, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with instructions to enter an order affording reasonable opportunity for the preparation, presentation, settling, and filing of a suitable bill of exceptions, and with permission to the court to hear argument and redetermine the case insofar as that course may be required if such a bill is filed, or to take such further proceedings and enter such further orders as may seem appropriate if no adequate bill can be settled.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the *584consideration and decision of this case. Leo S. Holmes, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and W. Marvin Smith for the United States.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.