Ex parte Botwinski

Supreme Court of the United States
Ex parte Botwinski, 314 U.S. 586 (1942)
62 S. Ct. 476

Ex parte Botwinski

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

It does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his state remedies by applying for a writ of error coram nobis. State ex rel. Dowd v. Superior Court of La Porte County, 36 N. E. 2d 765; State ex rel. Kunkel v. Circuit Court of La Porte County, 209 Ind. 682, 200 N. E. 614. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice. Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ex parte John Botwinski
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published