Ex parte Botwinski
Ex parte Botwinski
314 U.S. 586; 62 S. Ct. 476
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Noia, Relator-Appellant v. Edwin M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, State of New York (2d Cir. 1962)
- Hawk v. Olson (8th Cir. 1942)
- Hawk v. Olson (8th Cir. 1942)
- Curran v. Wooley (Superior Court of Delaware 1953)
- Curran v. Wooley (Superior Court of Delaware 1953)
- Darr v. Burford (Supreme Court of the United States 1950)
- Jones v. Dowd (7th Cir. 1942)
- Ex parte Abernathy (Supreme Court of the United States 1943)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his state remedies by applying for a writ of error coram nobis. State ex rel. Dowd v. Superior Court of La Porte County, 36 N. E. 2d 765; State ex rel. Kunkel v. Circuit Court of La Porte County, 209 Ind. 682, 200 N. E. 614. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is therefore denied without prejudice. Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.