Supreme Court of the United States, 1942

United States ex rel. Robinson v. Johnston

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 8, 1942

316 U.S. 649; 62 S. Ct. 1301 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Thomas Henry Robinson, Jr., pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. W. Marvin Smith for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Western Pac R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. Metzger v. Western Pac. R. Co. (9th Cir. 1952)
Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1953)
Independence Lead Mines Co. v. Kingsbury (9th Cir. 1949)
Thomas Henry Robinson, Jr. v. United States (6th Cir. 1968)
United States v. Morgan (Supreme Court of the United States 1954)
Wallace v. United States (8th Cir. 1949)
Price v. Johnston (9th Cir. 1947)
Robinson v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1945)
Robinson v. United States (6th Cir. 1944)
Robinson v. Johnston (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1943)
Crutchfield v. United States (9th Cir. 1943)
Robinson v. Johnston (9th Cir. 1942)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing is granted. The second petition for rehearing is granted. The order denying certiorari, 314 U. S. 675, is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is also granted. In view of the conflict of views which has arisen among the judges of the Ninth Circuit with respect to the decision in this case (see Robinson v. Johnston, 118 F. 2d 998, 1001, and Crockett v. United States, 125 F. 2d 547, 548, 549), and in view of this Court’s decision in Waley v. Johnston, ante, p. 101, re*650versing 124 F. 2d 587, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings, including leave to petitioner to apply for a hearing before the court en banc. See Textile Mills Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U. S. 326.

Thomas Henry Robinson, Jr., pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. W. Marvin Smith for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.