Ex Parte Elmer Davis
Cases that cite this one
35 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Potter v. Dowd (7th Cir. 1944)
- Daniels v. Allen, Warden, Central Prison of the State of North Carolina (4th Cir. 1951)
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Noia, Relator-Appellant v. Edwin M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, State of New York (2d Cir. 1962)
- Stonebreaker v. Smyth (4th Cir. 1947)
- People v. Paiva (Cal. 1948)
- Williams v. Greco (District Court, S.D. New York 1977)
- United States of America Ex Rel. Malachi Beard, Jr. v. Alfred T. Rundle, Supt. (3d Cir. 1970)
- In re Goss (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 1966)
- Vincent Lee v. State of Kansas (10th Cir. 1965)
- In re Ortega (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1957)
- Galloway v. Dowd. Witte v. Dowd (7th Cir. 1953)
- Vahlberg v. Turner (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1953)
- United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. Baldi (3d Cir. 1952)
- Scott v. Henslee (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 1952)
- Buchanan v. O'Brien (1st Cir. 1950)
- United States Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Ragen (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1949)
- United States ex rel. White v. Walsh (7th Cir. 1949)
- Hawk v. Jones (8th Cir. 1947)
- Barton v. Smith (9th Cir. 1947)
- People ex rel. Ross v. Nierstheimer (7th Cir. 1945)
- McCrea v. Jackson (6th Cir. 1945)
- United States Ex Rel. Bongiorno v. Ragen (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1944)
- Herzog v. Colpoys (D.C. Cir. 1944)
- Guy v. Utecht (8th Cir. 1944)
- Guy v. Utecht (D. Minn. 1944)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
After we denied, without prejudice, petitioner’s previous application for leave to file in this Court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 U. S. 592, the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana, on December 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the Supreme Court of Indiana. He also alleges that his request that a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding be furnished free of charge, because he is a poor person, has been denied. He contends that in the absence of a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding, he is left without a remedy by appeal in the courts of Indiana. But we cannot assume that the Supreme Court of Indiana will refuse to use its process to bring before it such parts of the record as may be necessary for a decision of the case, or that, in that event, it will refuse to enter an order finally disposing of the appeal. Until the Supreme Court of Indiana has acted upon an application for an order finally disposing of the appeal — which, if adverse to petitioner, he could make the subject of a petition for certiorari to this Court — the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure have not been fully exhausted. Accordingly, we deny petitioner’s present application without prejudice.
Leave denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.