Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors

Supreme Court of the United States
Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors, 318 U.S. 744 (1943)
63 S. Ct. 849

Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Mutual Orange Distributors

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated, without costs to either party in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint as moot. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-8; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 306 U. S. 619; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union *745Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526.

Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.

Reference

Full Case Name
Agricultural Prorate Commission of California v. Mutual Orange Distributors
Status
Published
↑