Supreme Court of the United States, 1944

Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 9, 1944

323 U.S. 667; 65 S. Ct. 41; 89 L. Ed. 543; 1944 U.S. LEXIS 307 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Ralph Ulsh, Harry D. Femke, and James McEvoy, Jr. for appellant., Solicitor General , Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., appellees.

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (District Court, S.D. Illinois 1961)
Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United States (District Court, E.D. Virginia 1950)
State ex rel. L. L. A. (Passaic County Family Court 1980)
Dixie Highway Express, Inc. v. United States (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 1968)
Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. v. United States (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1968)
Alabama Highway Express, Inc. v. United States (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1965)
State of New York, Claimant-Appellant v. James B. Kilsheimer, Iii, and Jacob Grumet, Receivers for New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company (2d Cir. 1957)
Coyle Lines Inc. v. United States (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1953)
American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. United States (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1951)
United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1950)
Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. (5th Cir. 1950)
Lang Transp. Corporation v. United States (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1948)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Pan American Corp., 304 U. S. 156, 158; United States v. Wabash R. Co., 321 U. S. 403.

Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.