Supreme Court of the United States, 1945

Oriolo v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 26, 1945 · Below, Douglas, Inapplicable, Mortensen, Should, Stated, That

324 U.S. 824; 65 S. Ct. 683 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas D. McBride for petitioner., Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Langford v. United States (9th Cir. 1949)
United States v. Kenneth Schneider (3d Cir. 2015)
United States v. Schneider (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2011)
Herman Edward Nelms v. United States of America, (Two Cases) (4th Cir. 1961)
United States v. Sidney M. Ross (2d Cir. 1958)
Ralph Becker v. United States (8th Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U. S. 369.

The *825Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson think that the judgment should be affirmed, the Mortensen case being inapplicable for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court below. Mr. Thomas D. McBride for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.