Supreme Court of the United States, 1945

Oriolo v. United States

Oriolo v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 26, 1945 · Below, Douglas, Inapplicable, Mortensen, Should, Stated, That
324 U.S. 824; 65 S. Ct. 683 (United States Reports)

Oriolo v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U. S. 369.

The *825Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson think that the judgment should be affirmed, the Mortensen case being inapplicable for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court below. Mr. Thomas D. McBride for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.