Supreme Court of the United States, 1945

Hearst Magazines, Inc. v. De Acosta

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 21, 1945 · Granted, Murphy, Should

325 U.S. 862; 65 S. Ct. 1197 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Alfred H. Wasserstrom for petitioner in No. 1146., Messrs. Benjamin J. Rabin and Milton Diamond for petitioner in No. 1157., Messrs. Carl J. Austrian and Saul J. Lance for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Greenbie v. Noble (District Court, S.D. New York 1957)
Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1966)
Smith v. Little, Brown & Company (District Court, S.D. New York 1965)
Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc. v. H. L. Green Company, Inc., and Third Party Jalen Amusement Company, Inc., and Third Party (2d Cir. 1963)
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company v. Brown (District Court, E.D. New York 1963)
Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Acadia Company (District Court, S.D. New York 1959)
Szekely v. Eagle Lion Films, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1956)
Lake v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1956)
Loew's Incorporated v. Columbia Broadcasting System (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Ap*863peals for the Second Circuit denied.

Mr. Alfred H. Wasserstrom for petitioner in No. 1146. Messrs. Benjamin J. Rabin and Milton Diamond for petitioner in No. 1157. Messrs. Carl J. Austrian and Saul J. Lance for respondent. Mr. Justice Murphy is of opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Reported below: 146 F. 2d 408.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.