Supreme Court of the United States, 1947

Federal Power Commission v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Federal Power Commission v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 10, 1947
330 U.S. 802; 67 S. Ct. 963; 91 L. Ed. 1261; 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2554 (United States Reports)

Federal Power Commission v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Judgment reversed on the ground that respondent has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 *803U. S. 41; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 327 U. S. 540.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert L. Stern, Lambert McAllister and Louis W. McKernan. A. J. G. Priest argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were P. A. Lasley, Sidman I. Barber and B. H. Dewey, Jr. By special leave of Court, Wyatt Cleveland Holland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Arkansas. With him on the brief were Guy E. Williams, Attorney General, H. Cecil Kilpatrick, and the Attorneys General of the States of Alabama, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming, as amici curiae.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.