149 Madison Avenue Corp. v. Asselta
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Mary E. Hammond, Individually and Mary E. Hammond as She is the of the Estate of Charles E. Hammond v. United States (1st Cir. 1986)
- Wells v. City of Fairmont (W. Va. 1984)
- Scholl v. McWilliams Dredging Co. (2d Cir. 1948)
- Reed v. Murphey (5th Cir. 1948)
- St. Johns River Shipbuilding Co. v. Adams (5th Cir. 1947)
- Rodriguez v. City of Albuquerque (District Court, D. New Mexico 2009)
- Theisen v. City of Maple Grove (D. Minn. 1999)
- Adams v. Department of Juvenile Justice (2d Cir. 1998)
- Hergenreter v. City of Fort Dodge (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1997)
- Ronald L. Aaron, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, Defendant-Appellant/, Cross-Appellee (10th Cir. 1995)
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. First RepublicBank Corp. (5th Cir. 1993)
- Aaron v. City of Wichita, Kan. (District Court, D. Kansas 1992)
- Kitchen v. United States (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1989)
- Memorial Hospital, Cross-Appellees v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Cross-Appellant (11th Cir. 1983)
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension Trust (2d Cir. 1978)
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Farr (2d Cir. 1967)
- Kemp v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc. (Iowa 1948)
- Webster-Brinkley Co. v. Belfield (9th Cir. 1948)
- Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property Services (7th Cir. 2010)
- TGX Corporation v. Simmons (5th Cir. 1993)
- John Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation (7th Cir. 1976)
- Mirabal v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (7th Cir. 1976)
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Farr (District Court, S.D. New York 1965)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On consideration of the motion of counsel for the petitioners to modify the judgment of this Court in this case, it is ordered that the judgment of affirmance entered herein on May 5, 1947, 331 U. S. 199, be modified so as to provide that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is affirmed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with authority in that Court to consider any matters presented to it under the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, approved May 14, 1947, 61 Stat. 84.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.