Supreme Court of the United States, 1947

Curley v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 2, 1947 · Applications, Consideration, Frankfurter, Granted, Murphy, Petitions, Should, That, Took

331 U.S. 837; 67 S. Ct. 1511 (United States Reports)

Counsel

William E. Leahy and Nicholas J. Chase for petitioner in No. 1211. Wm. B. O’Connell for petitioner in No. 1235. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Pueblo v. Colón Burgos (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1996)
State v. Mussall (La. 1988)
United States v. Simmons (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 1984)
Marshall v. State (Wyo. 1982)
Russell v. State (Wyo. 1978)
Cloman v. State (Wyo. 1978)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

Mr. Justice Murphy is of the opinion that the petitions for certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Frankfurter *838took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. William E. Leahy and Nicholas J. Chase for petitioner in No. 1211. Wm. B. O’Connell for petitioner in No. 1235. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Reported below: 81 U. S. App. D. C. 389, 160 F. 2d 229.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.