Supreme Court of the United States, 1948

Indiana ex rel. Mavity v. Tyndall

Indiana ex rel. Mavity v. Tyndall
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 16, 1948
333 U.S. 834; 68 S. Ct. 609 (United States Reports)

Counsel

C. James McLemore for relator in No. 545., W. N. Mullen for appellant in No. 557., Donald E. Wachhorst for Humphreys, appellee in No. 557.

Indiana ex rel. Mavity v. Tyndall

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: No. 545, 225 Ind. 360, 74 N. E. 2d 914; No. 557, 81 Cal. App. 2d 37, 183 P. 2d 344.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.