Supreme Court of the United States, 1948

Brunson v. North Carolina

Brunson v. North Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 15, 1948
333 U.S. 851; 68 S. Ct. 634 (United States Reports)

Counsel

William Reid Dalton argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Nathan Witt., Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General of North Carolina, argued the cause for respondent., With him on the brief were Harry McMullan, Attorney General, and James E. Tucker, Assistant Attorney General.

Brunson v. North Carolina

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Reversed. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U. S. 303; Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339; Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370; Carter v. Texas, 177 U. S. 442; Rogers v. Alabama, 192 U. S. 226; Norris v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 587; Hollins v. Oklahoma, 295 U. S. 394; Hale v. Kentucky, 303 U. S. 613; Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U. S. 354; Smith v. Texas, 311 U. S. 128; Hill v. Texas, 316 U. S. 400; Patton v. Mississippi, 332 U. S. 463.

Reported below: 227 N. C. 558, 559, 560, 561, 43 S. E. 2d 82, 83.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.