Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1948

National Maritime Union v. Herzog

National Maritime Union v. Herzog
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 21, 1948 · Are, Black, Down, Noted, Should
334 U.S. 854; 68 S. Ct. 1529; 92 L. Ed. 1776; 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2757; 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2215 (United States Reports)

National Maritime Union v. Herzog

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The decision of the statutory three-judge court is affirmed to the extent that it passes upon the validity of § 9 (f) and § 9 (g) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 136, 143; 29 U. S. C. §§ 141, 159 (f) 159 (g), Supp. 1947). We do not find it necessary to *855reach or consider the validity of § 9 (h).

William L. Standard and David Rein for appellants. Solicitor General Perlman for ap-pellees. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑