National Maritime Union v. Herzog

Supreme Court of the United States June 21, 1948

National Maritime Union v. Herzog, 334 U.S. 854 (1948)

68 S. Ct. 1529; 92 L. Ed. 1776; 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2757; 22 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2215

Are, Black, Down, Noted, Should

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The decision of the statutory three-judge court is affirmed to the extent that it passes upon the validity of § 9 (f) and § 9 (g) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 136, 143; 29 U. S. C. §§ 141, 159 (f) 159 (g), Supp. 1947). We do not find it necessary to *855reach or consider the validity of § 9 (h).

William L. Standard and David Rein for appellants. Solicitor General Perlman for ap-pellees. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Reference

Full Case Name: National Maritime Union of America v. Herzog
Cited By: 10 cases
Status: Published