Supreme Court of the United States, 1948

Bellaskus v. Crossman

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 18, 1948

335 U.S. 840; 69 S. Ct. 64; 93 L. Ed. 391; 1948 U.S. LEXIS 1670 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner submitted on brief pro se., Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent., With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Robert S. Erdahl.

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Lee Wei Fang v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States, Wang Siang-Ken v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Earl R. Cephus v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Casey v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1952)
Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (1st Cir. 1981)
United States v. Corbitt (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1973)
United States v. James Carlton (5th Cir. 1972)
Cosgrove v. County of Sacramento (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)
Dickson v. United States (D.C. 1967)
Swain v. State (Ala. 1963)
United States v. Frank Costello (2d Cir. 1958)
United States v. Puff (2d Cir. 1954)
Battle v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1953)
Simcic v. United States (D.C. 1952)
Koki Hirota v. General of the Army MacArthur Kenji Dohihara v. General of the Army MacArthur Koichi Kido v. General of the Army MacArthur (Supreme Court of the United States 1948)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General and consideration of the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its order discharging the rule to show cause and dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Robert S. Erdahl.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.