Supreme Court of the United States, 1948

Murphey v. Reed

Murphey v. Reed
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 15, 1948 · Black, Douglas, Mason, Murphy, Proceedings, Remanded, Rutledge, Should, That, View
335 U.S. 865; 69 S. Ct. 105; 93 L. Ed. 410; 1948 U.S. LEXIS 1568 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Webb M. Mize for petitioners. Charles S. Corben for respondents.

Murphey v. Reed

Cases that cite this one

38 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments below are vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss those causes of action involving solely construction work, and to reconsider the remaining causes of action in the light of the decision of this Court in Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co., 334 U. S. 249.

Mr. Justice Rutledge is of the opinion that the case as a whole should be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in view of the decision of this Court in Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co., 334 U. S. 249. Dissenting: Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.