Supreme Court of the United States, 1949

Superior Court of California v. Lillefloren

Superior Court of California v. Lillefloren
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 10, 1949
335 U.S. 906; 69 S. Ct. 410 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Russell E. Parsons argued the cause for petitioners., With him on the brief was Harold W. Kennedy. Herbert S. Thatcher and David Sokol argued the cause for respondents., With Mr. Thatcher on the brief were Henry C. Bodkin, J. Albert Woll and James A. Glenn for Lillefloren et al., respondents; and Mr. Sokol filed a brief for Sylvane et al., respondents. John C. Stevenson and Mathew O. Tobriner filed a brief for the California State Federation of Labor, as amicus curiae, urging that the case be dismissed.

Superior Court of California v. Lillefloren

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

It appearing that there is a non-federal ground, independent of the federal ground, and adequate to support the judgment of the lower court, the case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207; Lynch v. New York ex rel. Pierson, 293 U. S. 52.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.