Supreme Court of the United States, 1949

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 31, 1949
337 U.S. 913; 69 S. Ct. 1155; 93 L. Ed. 1724; 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2995 (United States Reports)

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Opinion of the Court

Certiorari granted limited to the question of the construction of § 8 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 [49 Stat. 449, 29 U. S. C. § 158 (3)] in relation to this' *914case.

Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand and Bernard Durum filed a memorandum for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. Mathew O. Tobriner for the International Chemical Workers Union, A. F. of L., respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.