Supreme Court of the United States, 1949

Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 24, 1949

338 U.S. 854; 94 L. Ed. 523; 70 S. Ct. 99; 1949 U.S. LEXIS 1795 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Franklin C. Stark and Samuel B. Horovitz for petitioner. Everett A. Corten for the Industrial Accident Commission; and Oliver Dibble for the Kaiser Company et al., respondents.

Cases that cite this one

35 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

Coppola v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc. (Conn. 2007)
Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc. (La. 1989)
Johnson v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n (Tex. App. 1977)
Arp v. Maryland Casualty Company (La. Ct. App. 1965)
Lane v. Universal Stevedoring Co. (N.J. 1973)
Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1959)
Noah v. Liberty Mutual Insurance (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1958)
Uphold v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission (Ill. App. Ct. 2008)
Conrad Peter, in No. 88-3797 v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., in No. 88-3798 (3d Cir. 1990)
Allen v. Keeney (La. Ct. App. 1983)
Parfait v. Deroche (La. Ct. App. 1977)
Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. (La. 1976)
Marine Stevedoring Corp. v. Oosting (4th Cir. 1968)
Hansen v. Perth Amboy Dry Dock Co. (N.J. 1967)
Szumski v. Dale Boat Yards, Inc. (N.J. 1967)
Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Arrien (2d Cir. 1965)
Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. Arrien (2d Cir. 1965)
Michigan Mutual Liability Company v. Arrien (District Court, S.D. New York 1964)
Cordova Fish & Cold Storage Company v. Estes (Alaska 1962)
Travelers Insurance Company v. C. D. Calbeck (5th Cir. 1961)
Travelers Insurance v. Calbeck (5th Cir. 1961)
Clyde Flowers v. The Travelers Insurance Company (5th Cir. 1958)
Richard v. Lake Charles Stevedores (La. Ct. App. 1957)
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Marshall (Tex. App. 1957)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. It appears that the decision of this Court in Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, 335 U. S. 874, affirming the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 323 Mass. 162, 80 N. E. 2d 478, was not available to the District Court of Appeal at the time of its consideration of this cause. The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded to the District Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, supra, and Davis v. Department of Labor, 317 U. S. 249. See Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551; State Tax Comm’n v. Van Cott, 306 U. S. 511.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.