Supreme Court of the United States, 1950

Hynes v. Pratt

Hynes v. Pratt
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 9, 1950
338 U.S. 908; 70 S. Ct. 340 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill for petitioner.

Hynes v. Pratt

Opinion of the Court

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of *909mandamus is denied. Ex parte Fahey, 332 U. S. 258.

Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill for petitioner.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.