Supreme Court of the United States, 1951

Moore v. Mead Service Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 12, 1951

340 U.S. 944 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Dee C. Blythe for petitioner. Edward W. Napier, Howard F. Houk and Leslie Humphrey for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Charles Pfizer & Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1964)
John J. & Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1964)
H. & A. Selmer, Inc. v. Musical Instrument Exchange, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1957)
Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. v. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1957)
Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1955)
Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. Of Baltimore (4th Cir. 1953)
Interborough News Co. v. Curtis Pub. Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1952)
Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1952)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ *945of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, ante, p. 211.

Dee C. Blythe for petitioner. Edward W. Napier, Howard F. Houk and Leslie Humphrey for respondents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.