Supreme Court of the United States, 1951

Dority v. New Mexico ex rel. Bliss

Dority v. New Mexico ex rel. Bliss
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 7, 1951 · Are, Noted, Reed, Should
341 U.S. 924; 71 S. Ct. 798; 95 L. Ed. 1356; 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1894 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Caswell S. Neal for appellants. Joe L. Martinez, Attorney General of New Mexico, Joseph O. Walton, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.

Dority v. New Mexico ex rel. Bliss

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New Mexico. Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co., 295 U. S. 142.

Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.