Supreme Court of the United States, 1953

Federal Trade Commission v. Carter Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 9, 1953 · Douglas

346 U.S. 327; 74 S. Ct. 2; 98 L. Ed. 2d 4; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2681 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Acting Solicitor General Stern and William T. Kelley for petitioner., William L. Hanaway for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision. The 8 that cite it most often are listed here.

Caisson Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (3d Cir. 1980)
Floyd v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy (Ark. 1970)
Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Pennsylvania State Athletic Commission v. Bratton (Pa. Super. Ct. 1955)
Poole v. Unemployment Appeals Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Generella v. Weinberger (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1974)
Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (9th Cir. 1959)
Dolcin Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission (D.C. Cir. 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated.' The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate its prior judgment and order after amending it so that it specifically authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to open this proceeding for further evidence and a new order consistent with the Court of Appeals opinion herein. Cf. Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U. S. 269, 277; Labor Board v. Donnelly Garment Co., 330 U. S. 219, 224-228.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.