Supreme Court of the United States, 1953

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 2, 1953 · Black, Douglas, Down, Noted, Should
344 U.S. 925; 73 S. Ct. 498; 97 L. Ed. 712; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2431 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for Redwine, Harold Sheats and Standish Thompson for Fulton County, and Victor Davidson and Cleburne E. Gregory, Jr. for the City of Union Point et al., appellants., Robert B. Troutman and Furman Smith for appellee.

Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

Cases that cite this one

34 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm *926is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 216 U. S. 420; Georgia R. Co. v. Redwine, 342 U. S. 299.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorney General, for Redwine, Harold Sheats and Standish Thompson for Fulton County, and Victor Davidson and Cleburne E. Gregory, Jr. for the City of Union Point et al., appellants. Robert B. Troutman and Furman Smith for appellee. Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.