Supreme Court of the United States, 1953

Harrison v. Bohnen

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 4, 1953 · Consideration, Took

345 U.S. 946; 73 S. Ct. 863; 97 L. Ed. 1371; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2690; 48 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 235 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Lee A. Jackson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack and Hilbert P. Zarky. George S. Stansell argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

22 later published cases cite this decision.

Knox Hill Tenant Council v. Walter E. Washington, Individually and as Commissioner of the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir. 1971)
State v. Weddle (N.M. 1967)
Albert Francis Frazier v. Olin G. Blackwell, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 1963)
Mark Coppedge, Jr. v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1962)
United States v. Fears (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
American Medical Ass'n v. Heckler (District Court, S.D. Indiana 1985)
United States v. Wolfson (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1971)
United States ex rel. Hough v. Maroney (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1965)
Caulfield v. U. S. Department Of Agriculture (5th Cir. 1961)
Reed v. Franke (4th Cir. 1961)
United States Ex Rel. Kiernan v. La Vallee (District Court, N.D. New York 1961)
Caulfield v. U. S. Department of Agriculture (5th Cir. 1961)
Reed v. Franke (4th Cir. 1961)
Medberry v. Patterson (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 1959)
Francis J. Curran, Francis J. Maguire and Ira F. Jones, Jr. v. State of Delaware (3d Cir. 1958)
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company v. Smith (3d Cir. 1957)
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith (3d Cir. 1957)
Bohnen v. Harrison (7th Cir. 1956)
Bohnen v. Harrison (7th Cir. 1956)
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Smith (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1956)
Bohnen v. Harrison (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1955)
Christoffel v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*946Certiorari, 345 U. S. 903, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.