Supreme Court of the United States, 1953

Tom We Shung v. Brownell

Tom We Shung v. Brownell
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 7, 1953 · Douglas, Jackson, Re, Verse
346 U.S. 906; 74 S. Ct. 237; 98 L. Ed. 405; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1386 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.

Tom We Shung v. Brownell

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision. The 20 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.

Mr. Justice Black would re*907verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent. Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.