Arizona v. California Et Al.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1985)
- Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21 (District Court, E.D. New York 1974)
- Navajo Nation v. United States Department of the Interior (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2014)
- Nussbaum v. Weeks (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)
- Arizona v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
- Arizona v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 2006)
- Arizona v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 1956)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*986 It is ordered that George I. Haight, Esquire, of Chicago, Illinois, be, and he is hereby, appointed special master in this cause, with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The master is directed to find the facts specially and state separately his conclusions of law thereon, and to submit the same to this Court with all convenient speed, together with, a draft of the decree recommended by him. The findings, conclusions, and recommended decree of the master shall be subject to consideration, revision, or approval by the Court. The master shall be allowed his actual expenses and a reasonable compensation for his services to be fixed hereafter by the Court. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his stenographic and clerical assistants, and the cost of printing his report shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct. If the appointment herein made of a master is not accepted, or if the place becomes vacant during the recess of the Court, the Senior Associate Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.