Supreme Court of the United States, 1954

Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 18, 1954
346 U.S. 936; 74 S. Ct. 375; 98 L. Ed. 425; 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2693 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Carl M. Gould for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come filed a memorandum for respondent.

Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The petition for writ of certiorari to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is granted limited to the following question:

β€œIn view of the fact that exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter was in the National Labor Relations Board (Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U. S. 485), could *937the Federal District Court, on application of the Board, enjoin Petitioners from enforcing an injunction already obtained from the State Court?”
Carl M. Gould for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come filed a memorandum for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.