Supreme Court of the United States, 1955

Remmer v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 10, 1955 · Consideration, Conviction, Discussed, Remmer, Took, Trial, View, Would

348 U.S. 904; 75 S. Ct. 288 (United States Reports)

Counsel

John R. Golden, Leslie C. Gillen and Spurgeon Avakian for petitioner.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Ohio Power Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1957)
United States v. Ohio Power Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1957)
Mesarosh v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1956)
Elmer F. Remmer v. United States (9th Cir. 1955)
United States v. Ohio Power Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1957)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

347 U. S. 227. On motion for leave to file and petition for rehearing.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file and the petition for rehearing are granted. This case is restored to the docket, and the whole record, including the findings and order of Judge Goodman, is remanded to the Court of Appeals for its consideration on the errors assigned when the case was before the Court of Appeals before, in order that the Court on the whole record may reconsider the case in the light of our recent decisions in Holland v. United States, 348 U. S. 121; Friedberg v. United States, 348 U. S. 142; Smith v. United States, 348 U. S. 147; and United States v. Calderon, 348 U. S. 160, and Judge Goodman’s findings and order.

Mr. Justice Black would reverse the judgment of conviction and grant a new trial in view of the jury incident discussed in Remmer v. United States, 347 U. S. 227. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.