Supreme Court of the United States, 1955

Daniman v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 7, 1955 · City, Education, Hold, Noted, Slochower, York

348 U.S. 933; 99 L. Ed. 732; 75 S. Ct. 355; 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1190 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Harold I. Cammer and Paxton Blair for appellants., Daniel T. Scannell and Helen R. Cassidy for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York City (Supreme Court of the United States 1956)
Endresz v. Friedberg (N.Y. 1969)
Austin v. Board of Higher Education (New York Supreme Court 1957)
Daniman v. Board of Education (Supreme Court of the United States 1956)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want *934of a properly presented federal question.

Harold I. Cammer and Paxton Blair for appellants. Daniel T. Scannell and Helen R. Cassidy for appellees. Mr. Justice Black would hold this case for the decision in No. 466, Slochower v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York [probable jurisdiction noted, post, p. 935].

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.