Supreme Court of the United States, 1955

Moore v. United States

Moore v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 28, 1955
348 U.S. 966; 75 S. Ct. 530 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Francis Heisler for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Carl H. Imlay for the United States.

Moore v. United States

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for certiorari is granted. Petitioner and witnesses tendered by him declined, because of religious scruples against oath-taking, to use the word “solemnly” in affirming to tell the truth. The trial court refused to permit them to testify. There is no requirement that the word “solemnly” be used in the affirmation, and the judgment of conviction is therefore reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.