Supreme Court of the United States, 1955

Fong v. Dulles

Fong v. Dulles
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 31, 1955
349 U.S. 941; 75 S. Ct. 870; 99 L. Ed. 1269; 1955 U.S. LEXIS 736 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Joseph S. Hertogs for petitioners., Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.

Fong v. Dulles

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in accordance with the Govern*942ment’s suggestion.

Joseph S. Hertogs for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.