Naim v. Naim
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Norwood W. Barber, United States of America v. Linda K. Barber (4th Cir. 1996)
- Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners (5th Cir. 1959)
- Hunt v. Roth (8th Cir. 1981)
- Arthur J. Kraus v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary, Department of State (D.C. Cir. 1956)
- William Andrew Washington v. Donald Clemmer (D.C. Cir. 1964)
- In re Marriage Cases (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)
- United States v. Emanuel Clemons, United States of America v. Archie Blyther, Jr. (D.C. Cir. 1970)
- King v. State (Md. 1984)
- LeBlanc v. Foti (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1980)
- United States v. Scott Allen Noland (5th Cir. 1974)
- United States v. Noland (District Court, W.D. Texas 1973)
- Schultz v. Hartin & Son (4th Cir. 1970)
- Schultz v. W. R. Hartin & Son, Inc. (4th Cir. 1970)
- Lawrence v. Blackwell (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1969)
- Loving v. Commonwealth (Va. 1966)
- Alvey v. Hedin (Md. 1966)
- United States v. Fance Bell (7th Cir. 1965)
- Lawrence Allison Hobart v. United States (9th Cir. 1960)
- United States v. James Duhart (2d Cir. 1959)
- Spirt v. Bechtel (2d Cir. 1956)
- Whittle v. Board of Zoning Appeals (Md. 1956)
- Spirt v. Bechtel (2d Cir. 1956)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
The inadequacy of the record as to the relationship of the parties to the Commonwealth of Virginia at the time of the marriage in North Carolina and upon their return to Virginia, and the failure of the parties to bring here all questions relevant to the disposition of the case, prevents the constitutional issue of the validity of the Virginia statute on miscegenation tendered here being considered “in clean-cut and concrete form, unclouded” by such problems. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U. S. 549, 584. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals in order that the case may be returned to the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth for action not inconsistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.