Supreme Court of the United States, 1955

Gonzales v. Landon

Gonzales v. Landon
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 12, 1955
350 U.S. 920; 76 S. Ct. 210; 100 L. Ed. 806; 1955 U.S. LEXIS 3 (United States Reports)

Counsel

A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Fred Okrand. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop. Briefs of amici curiae were filed by John W. Willis for Mendoza-Martinez, and by Osmond K. Fraenkel and Loren Miller for the American Civil Liberties Union.

Gonzales v. Landon

Cases that cite this one

35 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*920Cer-tiorari, 349 U. S. 943, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Argued December 7-8, 1955. Decided December 12, 1955.

Per Curiam:

The Court is of the view that the standard of proof required in denaturalization cases (see Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U. S. 118; Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U. S. 665) is applicable to expatriation cases arising under § 401 (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1137, as amended, and has not been satisfied in this case. Accordingly the judgment below is reversed without reaching the constitutional questions that have been presented.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.