Florida Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control of Fla.
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Fordice (Supreme Court of the United States 1992)
- Knight v. State of Ala. (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1991)
- National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People v. Macdonald Gallion (5th Cir. 1961)
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Gallion (5th Cir. 1961)
- State Ex Rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control (Fla. 1957)
- Norris v. State Council of Higher Education (District Court, E.D. Virginia 1971)
- Charles C. Rouse v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, Saint Elizabeths Hospital (D.C. Cir. 1967)
- Browder v. Gayle (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1956)
- United States v. Ohio Power Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1957)
- United States v. State of La. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1993)
- United States v. Louisiana (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1993)
- Foster v. State (Fla. 1992)
- The Florida Bar (Fla. 1988)
- Ayers v. Allain (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 1987)
- Geier v. University Of Tennessee (6th Cir. 1979)
- Geier v. University of Tennessee (6th Cir. 1979)
- Berry v. School Dist. of City of Benton Harbor (District Court, W.D. Michigan 1978)
- In re Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners (Fla. 1976)
- Geier v. Dunn (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 1972)
- Watson v. City of Memphis (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
- Mapp v. Board of Education (6th Cir. 1963)
- Meredith v. Fair (5th Cir. 1962)
- Guillory v. Administrators of Tulane University of Louisiana (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1962)
- Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1962)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The petition for certiorari is denied.
On May 24, 1954, we issued a mandate in this case to the Supreme Court of Florida. 347 U. S. 971. We directed that the case be reconsidered in light of our decision in the Segregation Cases decided May 17, 1954, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483. In doing so, we did not imply that decrees involving graduate study present the problems of public elementary and secondary schools. We had theretofore, in three cases, ordered the admission of Negro applicants to graduate schools without discrimination because of color. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U. S. 629; Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U. S. 631; cf. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U. S. 637. Thus, our second decision in the Brown case, 349 U. S. 294, which implemented the earlier one, had no application to a case involving a Negro applying for *414 admission to a state law school. Accordingly, the mandate of May 24, 1954, is recalled and is vacated. In lieu thereof, the following order is entered:
Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded on the authority of the Segregation Cases decided May 17,1954, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483. As this case involves the admission of a Negro to a graduate professional school, there is no reason for delay. He is entitled to prompt admission under the rules and regulations applicable to other qualified candidates. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U. S. 629; Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U. S. 631; cf. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U. S. 637.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.