Supreme Court of the United States, 1956

Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 9, 1956
350 U.S. 926; 100 L. Ed. 810; 76 S. Ct. 300; 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1537 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Armistead B. Rood, Joseph B. Hyman, Cassius M. Clay and Sidney H. Willner for appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Robert W. Ginnane and Isaac K. Hay for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and William T. Griffin and Herbert Burstein for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., appellees.

Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Cases that cite this one

47 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*926Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Per Curiam:

The motion of Boston & Providence Railroad Corporation Stockholders Committee for leave to intervene or, in the alternative, to file brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.