Supreme Court of the United States, 1956

United States v. Twin City Power Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 30, 1956 · Burton, City, Frankfurter, Harlan, Minton, Power, Stated

350 U.S. 956; 76 S. Ct. 346; 100 L. Ed. 832; 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1451 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Sobelofj for the United States. David W. Robinson for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Twin City Power Company of Georgia, Twin City Power Company of Georgia v. United States (5th Cir. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U. S. 222.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Minton, and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Burton's dissent in United States v. Twin City

*957

Power Co., 350 U. S., at 229. Solicitor General Sobelofj for the United States. David W. Robinson for respondents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.