Supreme Court of the United States, 1956

Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank

Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 30, 1956 · No. 731
351 U.S. 916; 100 L. Ed. 1449; 76 S. Ct. 709; 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1040 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Charles K. Chapman for the Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Assn, et al., and F. Henry NeCasek for the Home Investment Co., appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Donald B. Mac-Guineas for McAllister et al., and Sylvester Hoffmann for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, appellees. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief on behalf of the citizens of California, as amici curiae, in support of appellants.

Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank

Opinion of the Court

*916Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[*]

[As amended, post, p. 922.]

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.